Ferguson, the FBI and the Media’s Dangerous turn towards Violence


The media, ahead of the verdict of whether or not to indict Officer Darrel Wilson for the shooting death of Michael Brown has taken a dangerous turn. That turn, in the view of many concerned Americans risks a perversion of the First Amendment by nakedly enflaming tensions, creating terror among civilians and seeking to directly affect events rather than report on or reflect them. Worse, there is growing evidence that the government, in particular the FBI and law enforcement are acting in collusion, or sympathy with the corporate Press; the endgame, a Boston-bombing style assault on civil liberties.

Rightwing hosts and so-called journalists (re: propagandists) like Breitbart and others purposely skewed and obtusely reframed dissent by activists and residents nationwide as looming violence. Their reporting, which largely targets white demographics seemed specifically intended to accomplish three fundamental points: Encourage gun sales, drive a stronger rightwing agenda and to undermine voices on the Left, particularly at a time when key issues like the XL Keystone pipeline, Net Neutrality and Trans Pacific Partnership are being decided. Republicans, while losing the pipeline vote in the Senate yesterday by a single vote, while reintroduce the bill in January when their chances are better for a victory in both houses.

Statements by activists regarding efforts to protest and rally, pursuant to their fundamental constitutional right were repeatedly skewed and reframed by the media as violent and threatening. There was no effort for balance, no counterpoint and no effort at correction. The strategy was clear, frighten the American people. But that has been the tactic of the rightwing media, except that the Left also made no effort to counter message with the truth, or by bringing activist and protest voices to the airwaves. That media message worked in tandem with deliberately inflammatory and irresponsible statements by the FBI. An FBI bulletin to law enforcement, and distributed widely by the media read in part:

“The announcement of the grand jury’s decision … will likely be exploited by some individuals to justify threats and attacks against law enforcement and critical infrastructure…This also poses a threat to those civilians engaged in lawful or otherwise constitutionally protected activities…Those infiltrating and exploiting otherwise legitimate public demonstrations with the intent to incite and engage in violence could be armed…The FBI assesses those infiltrating and exploiting otherwise legitimate public demonstrations with the intent to incite and engage in violence could be armed with bladed weapons or firearms, equipped with tactical gear/gas masks, or bulletproof vests to mitigate law enforcement measures.”

There have long been allegations that law enforcement agent provocateurs have infiltrated peaceful protests around the country to undermine protected public dissent for political and economic purposes. Those economic reasons always protect specific corporate interests outside the law and the wishes of the vast majority of Americans.

In the aftermath of the Boston marathon bombing, and the subsequent manhunt for a single suspect constitutional rights at all levels were brazenly violated in martial-law style house to house searches, with residents ordered from homes at gunpoint, and an entire American city locked down. There was virtually no reaction and no civil right inquiries following Boston. It is alleged that Boston was a convenient experiment for mass public control by law enforcement. Spying and data collection on a mass scale against activists and civilians alike continued and expanded greatly in the time since Boston. The media was a key partner in that effort.

Ferguson is the next major step in a broader effort to roll back civil liberties and exercise greater control over dissent and citizen activism. With Boston the media had to play catch-up to the government. Here they are, or seem to be working in a dangerous partnership. In the next article I will tell you the endgame for this effort, who is behind it and why it is structured this way…

CAM00236WC Turck is an author, artist, playwright and talk radio host in Chicago. He has been called the most dangerous voice on the Left. He is currently working on a new book “Shoot Down: An unflinching look at the events leading up to the shooting down of Malaysia Air Flight 17.” His first novel, “Broken” was recommended by NAMI for its treatment of PTSD. In 2006 he published “Everything for Love,” a memoir of his experiences during the siege of Sarajevo. He wrote and produced two critically acclaimed plays, “Occupy my Heart” and “The People’s Republic of Edward Snowden.” He works with the homeless and foreclosure victims in Chicago. He partners in a weekly radio show dedicated to issues, society and politics with cohost, activist and artist Brian Murray For more information, past shows, videos and articles, visit www.revolutioandbeer.com

The Illinois Policy Institute (IPI) is a conservative think tank with offices in Chicago and Springfield, Illinois, and member of the State Policy Network. IPI is a member of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) as of 2011. IPI is also a member of ALEC’s Health and Human Services Task Force and Education Task Force. Senior Budget and Tax Policy Analyst, Amanda Griffin-Johnson, presented model legislation (the “State Employee Health Savings Account Act”) to the HHS task force at ALEC’s 2011 annual meeting.[4] Collin Hitt, Director of Education Policy, is a private sector member of the Education Task Force representing IPI. He sponsored the “Local Government Transparency Act” at the ALEC 2011 States and Nation Policy Summit. In its 2006 annual report the Cato Institute states that it made a grant of $50,000 to the Illinois Policy Institute. The Cato Institute is a libertarian think tank founded by Charles G. Koch and funded by the Koch brothers.

Use Facebook to Comment on this Post

Reactionary of the Week: Update. Rand Paul’s Conspiracy Theories

lock3Recall that Revolution and Beer was concerned the day of the manhunt for the remaining Boston bomber on the militarism of the law enforcement authorities, the abandonment of Posse Comitatus, and the suspension of an entire American city’s civil rights for “special emergency” needs. We took a great deal of heat for that position, a position I should point out was shared by that liberal hippie, Benjamin Franklin. Well it seems now that Republicans have been asking some of those same questions, but what are they really saying?

“The Boston bombing provided the opportunity for the government to turn what should have been a police investigation into a military-style occupation of an American city…This unprecedented move should frighten us as much or more than the attack itself.”

Those were Texas Senator and way-too-close-for-comfort presidential candidate Ron Paul’s words yesterday.

“Forced lock-down of a city. “Militarized police riding tanks in the streets. Door-to-door armed searches without warrant. Families thrown out of their homes at gunpoint to be searched without probable cause. Businesses forced to close. Transport shut down,” were, he wrote, alarmingly similar to a “military coup in a far off banana republic.”


So what is the real difference in our positions? Our has always been about control, and less the government’s conspiracy of total domination and oppression of the people as it is the American people’s urgent need to become involved investors in their government. Certainly elected officials, law enforcement and bureaucrats can create distance and barriers in their overreach, but we as citizens also create distance and barriers through apathy and disengagement. Silence is approval, and if we are silent on issues-and not in small numbers-what is the government listening to?

The fundamental difference with the Republican position, and their sudden “discovery” of liberty and civil rights is that theirs is inward looking, manipulative and paranoid. The right will use this for the out of control proliferation of guns in America and to confuse the American public about even the most reasonable of legislation. They pander to the crazies and fools who would-and have in some cases-already abandoned their government and nation with far flung conspiracies about United Nations rule, Jihadists in the Whitehouse, the imminent collapse of the economy and the need to buy gold when the dollar crumbles in the face of social anarchy. By the way, those terrible predictions are simply to frighten folks to but products to make a few people rich; Gold, Food insurance, Guns, Texas realestate. Advertising and marketing-sell to the base emotions, namely sex and fear. In 21st Century America, fear sells big!

Think I’m wrong? Cited in the PressTV piece was this from Bloomberg. That in “the aftermath of the bombings in Boston, Police Commissioner Edward Davis wants even more cameras to boost street-level surveillance…Other cities, too, now may be spurred to expand their systems, which security specialists said will fuel sales growth in the $3.2 billion video surveillance industry.

The Revolution and Beer position has always been about empowering the individual to become and active voice in the nation. The republican position, including Ron Paul was always been about frightening the individual into buying an ideology to sell a product. It is an important and fundamental distinction, and one with historic ramifications for our nation.

Catch 900poundgorilla’s WC Turck and Brian Murray only at Revolutionand Beer.com. Watch for the show coming in June to CAN TV in Chicago

Friend us on Facebook at Revolution and Beer and at revolutionandbeer.com. And if you have a cause to champion, please let us know as we work to become the grassroots support network for Chicago Activists and community organizers.

Catch the beer of the week review with 900poundgorilla’s and check out the weekly food pairings for our featured beers with innovative and original dishes by Chef AJ Francisco. Friend us on Facebook at Revolution and Beer. And find all of the great beers we review each week at Louis Glunz Beer Inc., www.glunzbeers.com

Use Facebook to Comment on this Post